Procurement
- Rate movement per item
- RFQ and quote comparison
- Generate an RFQ
Manufacturing
Catch the cost movement that changes a job's margin.
Connect purchasing, stock, production records, sales, and finance so rate spikes, BOM-versus-actual consumption, COGS variance, and collection risk are visible while the work is still open.
Book a manufacturing demo
Analysis was never the point. Execution is.
Rotasu connects the records already held across ERP, CRM, documents, and finance systems. It flags what needs attention, shows the cause and owner, recommends the next step, and carries that action through the right approval flow.
Procurement
Rate movement per item
RFQ and quote comparison
Generate an RFQ
Inventory
Consumption-based min-max
Stock reconciliation
Order fulfilment exceptions
Forecasting and close
Budget against actual
Material price scenarios
Adjust approved budgets
COGS and margin
BOM vs actual consumption
COGS by component
Cost and margin per SKU
Vendor performance
Lead time and rejection rate
Vendor concentration risk
Notify the vendor with evidence
Sales and collections
Sales and DSO by owner
Customer credit exposure
Collection action and audit trail
Inventory
- Consumption-based min-max
- Stock reconciliation
- Order fulfilment exceptions
Forecasting and close
- Budget against actual
- Material price scenarios
- Adjust approved budgets
COGS and margin
- BOM vs actual consumption
- COGS by component
- Cost and margin per SKU
Vendor performance
- Lead time and rejection rate
- Vendor concentration risk
- Notify the vendor with evidence
Sales and collections
- Sales and DSO by owner
- Customer credit exposure
- Collection action and audit trail
The signals behind a manufacturing decision.
Every signal stays tied to the item, work order, vendor, customer, or owner that created it. The next action is visible beside the variance.
Repeat-item rate movement with the purchase history beside it
Every purchase stays against its vendor and its own history, so a rate spike arrives with the evidence needed to review terms or generate an RFQ.
A36 Plate 1/4inVendor A
OrderQtyRateΔ
PO-4901Jun 118.2 tn$1,212+6.2%
PO-4738May 1410.1 tn$1,141+0.3%
PO-4602Apr 97.2 tn$1,138+0.9%
PO-4471Mar 128.8 tn$1,128+1.4%
PO-4331Jan 167.5 tn$1,112+0.7%
PO-4218Dec 99.3 tn$1,104+0.5%
PO-4102Nov 147.9 tn$1,099—
BOM against actual consumption while the job is open
Issues and stock-ledger entries are matched to the BOM used on the work order, per item, while the job is still open.
Work order WO-2214Open
ItemBOMIssuedVar
A36 Plate 1/4in925 lb988 lb+63
Weld wire40 lb42 lb+2
Primer6 gal7 gal+1
Fasteners600 pcs600 pcsOn plan
Gasket set40 pcs40 pcsOn plan
Grinding disc30 pcs28 pcsOn plan
Thinner3 gal3 galOn plan
COGS and margin by component, item, and vendor
Consumption, invoice, and stock-ledger records explain the cost movement behind an item margin, so the variance has a source to investigate.
Top items by costThis quarter
ItemUsedCostMargin
A36 Plate 1/4in53 tn$61.0K11.2%
CR Sheet 16 ga24 tn$26.4K16.4%
CD Bar 1in10.6 tn$15.9K18.9%
SS Pipe 2in Sch 403.4 tn$13.6K21.3%
Weld wire3.1k lb$6.2K24.0%
Primer227 gal$5.7K26.5%
Fasteners42k pcs$3.4K31.8%
Vendor lead time, rejection, and concentration risk
Share of spend, lead time, on-time delivery, and rejection rate per vendor, with qualified alternates kept alongside.
Share of spendLast 12 months
Vendor A68%
Lead 14 dOn time 96%Reject 0.8%Concentrated
Vendor B16%
Lead 21 dOn time 88%Reject 2.4%
Vendor C8%
Lead 18 dOn time 91%Reject 1.6%
Vendor D5%
Lead 26 dOn time 84%Reject 3.1%
Vendor E3%
Lead 19 dOn time 90%Reject 1.9%
Sales, DSO, and margin analysis by salesperson
Orders, the margin they were booked at, and how long the money takes to come in — per person, from the same invoices the books run on.
Sales teamThis quarter
PersonOrdersMarginDSO
R. MillerWest3814.6%74 d
S. CarterSouth5219.8%41 d
A. NguyenMidwest4418.2%46 d
P. WalshNortheast3121.0%38 d
N. BrooksSoutheast2717.5%52 d
V. OrtizSouth2320.4%44 d
Min-max, stock risk, and the numbers the plant is run on
Margin, material cost, receivables, and stock days are read against the previous period, with the movement that needs an owner marked.
Q2 at a glancevs last quarter
MetricValueΔ
Gross margin18.4%−2.1 pts
Material cost / revenue61.2%+1.8 pts
DSO49 d+4 d
Inventory days63 d−3 d
Revenue$4.8M+6.5%
Scrap rate2.3%−0.2 pts
On-time shipment92%+1 pt
Keep your systems. Connect the work.
Rotasu works over the ERP, CRM, HRMS, email, and document stack you already run. It connects the work without introducing another system of record.
See how Rotasu keeps plant cost and margin in view.
Walk through cost movements, their causes, and actions assigned to the right team.
Manufacturing questions
Rotasu compares the quote or purchase against the item's history and supplier terms, then flags the variance with a recommended action such as generating an RFQ or reviewing the vendor contract.
BOM, stock-ledger, invoice, and actual-consumption records are brought together to show the component, item, or vendor behind a cost variance while the team can still act on it.
Yes. Consumption-based min-max levels, open POs, stock positions, and order-fulfilment gaps are visible together, so a shortage has a clear commercial consequence.
It can recommend and route the next step, including RFQs, vendor notices, budget adjustments, order actions, and exception assignment. Approvals and the resulting audit trail remain in the workflow.
No. Rotasu connects to the systems you already run and works across their records. Your ERP remains the system of record.
Yes. Sales movement, customer exposure, DSO, and receivables can be read alongside COGS and margin, rather than waiting for separate month-end reports.